feat: add support for exchange rate ccp #699
Conversation
anishfyle
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new field, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/quickbooks_online/migrations/0017_creditcardpurchase_exchange_rate.py (1)
16-16: Enhance the help text descriptionThe current help text could be more descriptive to better explain the purpose and context of this field.
Consider updating the help text to be more specific:
- help_text='Exchange rate' + help_text='Exchange rate used for converting foreign currency transactions to the base currency'apps/quickbooks_online/models.py (1)
654-654: Consider adding exchange rate validationWhile the implementation correctly uses the expense's exchange rate, consider adding validation to ensure the exchange rate is positive when present.
def create_credit_card_purchase(expense_group: ExpenseGroup, map_merchant_to_vendor: bool): description = expense_group.description expense = expense_group.expenses.first() + if expense.exchange_rate is not None and expense.exchange_rate <= 0: + raise ValueError("Exchange rate must be positive when present")apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py (2)
733-733: Simplify exchange rate retrieval using.get()methodUse
exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)instead of the conditional expression for cleaner and more Pythonic code.Apply this diff:
-purchase_object_payload['ExchangeRate'] = exchange_rate['Rate'] if "Rate" in exchange_rate else 1 +purchase_object_payload['ExchangeRate'] = exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
733-733: Use
exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)instead of anifblockReplace with
exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)(SIM401)
745-745: Replace list comprehension with a for loop for side-effect operationsUsing a list comprehension for its side effects is not recommended. Replace it with a standard for loop for better readability and adherence to best practices.
Apply this diff:
-[line['ItemBasedExpenseLineDetail'].pop('TaxAmount') for line in purchase_object_payload['Line'] if 'ItemBasedExpenseLineDetail' in line] +for line in purchase_object_payload['Line']: + if 'ItemBasedExpenseLineDetail' in line: + line['ItemBasedExpenseLineDetail'].pop('TaxAmount', None)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/quickbooks_online/migrations/0017_creditcardpurchase_exchange_rate.py(1 hunks)apps/quickbooks_online/models.py(2 hunks)apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py(2 hunks)tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py
733-733: Use exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1) instead of an if block
Replace with exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)
(SIM401)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/quickbooks_online/models.py (2)
602-602: LGTM: Exchange rate field properly defined
The exchange_rate field is appropriately defined as a nullable FloatField with clear help text, which aligns well with the PR's objective of supporting foreign currency transactions.
Line range hint 602-654: Verify exchange rate implementation completeness
Let's verify the complete implementation of the exchange rate feature.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the exchange rate implementation.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Exchange rate implementation is complete and properly handled
The exchange rate feature is fully implemented with:
- Model fields properly defined in both Bill and CreditCardPurchase models
- Proper migration files (0013 and 0017) for both models
- Complete exchange rate handling in QBO utils:
- Fetches exchange rates from QBO API for foreign currency transactions
- Updates the models with the fetched rates
- Handles both Bill and CreditCardPurchase scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for exchange rate related code and migrations
# Check for migration file
echo "Checking for migration file..."
fd ".*exchange_rate.*\.py$" apps/quickbooks_online/migrations/
# Check for exchange rate usage in other files
echo "Checking exchange rate usage in other files..."
rg "exchange_rate" --type python
# Check for any QBO API related files that might need updates
echo "Checking QBO API related files..."
fd "qbo.*\.py$" apps/quickbooks_online/
Length of output: 629
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check exchange rate usage with proper context
rg "exchange_rate" -t py -A 3 -B 3
# Check the content of the migration files
echo "Content of exchange rate migration files:"
cat apps/quickbooks_online/migrations/0013_bill_exchange_rate.py
cat apps/quickbooks_online/migrations/0017_creditcardpurchase_exchange_rate.py
# Check QBO expense model and serializer for exchange rate handling
echo "QBO expense related files:"
rg "exchange_rate" apps/quickbooks_online/serializers.py
Length of output: 7340
apps/quickbooks_online/utils.py (1)
731-733: Ensure exception handling when fetching exchange rates
Verify that the get_by_source method handles cases where the exchange rate is unavailable or the API call fails, to prevent unexpected exceptions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
733-733: Use exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1) instead of an if block
Replace with exchange_rate.get('Rate', 1)
(SIM401)
| migrations.AddField( | ||
| model_name='creditcardpurchase', | ||
| name='exchange_rate', | ||
| field=models.FloatField(help_text='Exchange rate', null=True), | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using DecimalField instead of FloatField for exchange rates
Using FloatField for exchange rates can lead to precision issues in financial calculations due to floating-point arithmetic limitations. This is particularly important for currency-related operations where exact precision is crucial.
Consider modifying the field definition to use DecimalField:
- field=models.FloatField(help_text='Exchange rate', null=True),
+ field=models.DecimalField(
+ max_digits=10,
+ decimal_places=6,
+ help_text='Exchange rate used for currency conversion',
+ null=True
+ ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.AddField( | |
| model_name='creditcardpurchase', | |
| name='exchange_rate', | |
| field=models.FloatField(help_text='Exchange rate', null=True), | |
| ), | |
| migrations.AddField( | |
| model_name='creditcardpurchase', | |
| name='exchange_rate', | |
| field=models.DecimalField( | |
| max_digits=10, | |
| decimal_places=6, | |
| help_text='Exchange rate used for currency conversion', | |
| null=True | |
| ), | |
| ), |
Description
Clickup
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
exchange_ratefield to the credit card purchase model for better handling of foreign currency transactions.Bug Fixes
Chores