model vs marketing name, cleaning up existing Gluon device names

[Djfe]

This is a continuation of questions that arose from #2966
Let's create a new issue to discuss this under ^^

Gluon uses model names for it's devices. But it doesn't do it for all supported devices, yet.
I could fix this with a PR, if desired. What's the maintainers' opinion on that?

---

The Mikrotik hAP AC² should/could actually be renamed to RBD52G-5HacD2HnD-TC?

gluon/targets/ipq40xx-mikrotik

Line 5 in ced0cca

device('mikrotik-hap-ac2', 'mikrotik_hap-ac2', {

here it says hAP in brackets
Would additional names in the supported_devices.rst be allowed? I feel like they have a use.

gluon/docs/user/supported_devices.rst

Line 170 in ced0cca

- RB951Ui-2nD (hAP)

Zyxel WSM20 (Multy M1) <- would work for me, but your decision.

More examples where the marketing name was preferred:
https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/blob/master/docs/user/supported_devices.rst?plain=1#L239-L241

---

same goes for Aruba:

gluon/docs/user/supported_devices.rst

Line 192 in ced0cca

- AP-303

model name appears to be actually: APIN0303

An example of the labels Aruba prints on the back of their devices:
Aruba InstantOn AP12 (RW)

InstantOn AP11(D)/AP17 are clearly marketing and not model names.

[neocturne]

Naming in the target files is determined by OpenWrt, this must match what libplatforminfo reports for the autoupdater to work (adding aliases or manifest aliases when different devices use the same image or image names have changed). If the name of a device is wrong, that is a bug and must be fixed.

In the docs, listing alternative marketing names sense.

[Djfe]

I just stumbled across devolo and their MT numbers.
Those are probably just type numbers and don't count as a model name, right?
https://www.devolo.de/support/ce

Example:
the devolo WiFi pro 1750e has MT: 2785