Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pip availability and clear versioning in branches/tags/releases #76

Open
cryptexis opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Pip availability and clear versioning in branches/tags/releases #76

cryptexis opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cryptexis
Copy link
Contributor

cryptexis commented Mar 25, 2024

Hi Pearl team,

thank you for all the work you have done.

The problem is I am having is the following:
while the Pearl is formulated as something to be used in production - simple procedures like versioning are not taken care of. We have developed a routine that every day an agent will be trained and deployed (and it is done in an environment such as AWS Sagemaker). What this entails is that when SM instance is spinning up, it must install the Pearl and all other important dependencies.
The way you have described in the documentation is not sufficient for the production work, when spontaneously changes are committed to the main branch. Stable versions are needed - where API, functionality and behavior are fixed for a given version.

Hope that makes sense also for you.

@rodrigodesalvobraz rodrigodesalvobraz added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 25, 2024
@rodrigodesalvobraz
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for making this point. You are absolutely right. We will prioritize this issue.

@anishpdoshi
Copy link

Plus one to availability via PyPi, that would unblock us from using this in a production system.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants