Replies: 1 comment
-
Okay it is officially |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Now that DisplayCAL is working with Python 3.8+ we need to have a new version number. I'm tempted to call it
4.0.0
(also getting rid of the 4 digit version numbering, which doesn't follow semantic versioning: https://semver.org/ ).But, increasing the major version from
3
to4
requires a huge change in the way the system is interpreting data, that makes it incompatible with the3
series. But, DisplayCAL is compatible with data created with Python 2.x version. So, this makes me think that we need to call it3.9.0
and not4.0.0
and reserve4.0.0
for huge changes like implementingQt
, changing the inner workings of DisplayCAL to make it more Pythonic etc.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions