Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add validation checks for access control databases. #114

Open
kushagra189 opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Add validation checks for access control databases. #114

kushagra189 opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
priority: low Low priority status: blocked Something prevents progress status flag: discuss Needs input from various people type: maintenance Related to general repository maintenance workload: hours Likely takes hours to resolve
Milestone
v1.0.0

Comments

@kushagra189
Copy link
Contributor

Reference: https://github.com/elixir-cloud-aai/foca/pull/109/files#r768258555

Case: In case the user utilizes the same database name/ collection name, FOCA needs to handle it robustly.
@kushagra189 kushagra189 added priority: low Low priority status flag: discuss Needs input from various people status: blocked Something prevents progress type: maintenance Related to general repository maintenance workload: hours Likely takes hours to resolve labels Jan 30, 2022
@kushagra189 kushagra189 self-assigned this Jan 30, 2022
@uniqueg uniqueg moved this to Todo access control in FOCA release Dec 2, 2023
@uniqueg uniqueg added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Dec 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority: low Low priority status: blocked Something prevents progress status flag: discuss Needs input from various people type: maintenance Related to general repository maintenance workload: hours Likely takes hours to resolve
Projects
FOCA release
Status: Todo access control
Milestone
v1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@uniqueg @kushagra189