Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

astropy -> pandas #110

Open
davidthomas5412 opened this issue Oct 27, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

astropy -> pandas #110

davidthomas5412 opened this issue Oct 27, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@davidthomas5412
Copy link
Collaborator

Problem:
We make heavy use of the astropy datastructures (table, column). It is not as widely used, documented, or as fast as pandas. For fits files we can use pyfits, so there should not be a strong reason for us to continue using astropy data structures.

Solution:
Replace astropy data structures with pandas equivalents. Confirm everything still works.

@drphilmarshall
Copy link
Owner

I approve this solution. Hopefully the switch will not be onerous!

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:17 PM, David Thomas [email protected]
wrote:

Problem:
We make heavy use of the astropy datastructures (table, column). It is not
as widely used, documented, or as fast as pandas. For fits files we can use
pyfits, so there should not be a strong reason for us to continue using
astropy data structures.

Solution:
Replace astropy data structures with pandas equivalents. Confirm
everything still works.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#110, or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AArY9zYM3Y9q2rogtUtl7bhjdJ5hsSf_ks5q4PjUgaJpZM4KiuPD
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants