[NETSDKE2E] [Regression]With 8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11 installed, the RID shows incorrectly on Linux Alpine3.18 Arm64

[v-xiaofchen]

Environment:

Alpine3.18 Arm64 in docker
.NET 8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11(runtime-8.0.0-rc.1.23414.4)

To Reproduce

Repro steps:

1. Prepare Alpine3.18 Arm64 in docker

2. Extract dotnet-sdk-8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11-linux-musl-arm64.tar.gz, and use the export command to set DOTNET_ROOT to the extracted folder's location and then ensure .NET is in PATH

3. Run 'dotnet --info' and observe

Expected behavior

RID shows "alpine.3.18-arm64".

Actual behavior

RID shows "linux-musl-arm64"

Regression?

This issue not repro on 8.0.100-rc.1.23407.2(runtime- 8.0.0-rc.1.23381.3)

[martincostello]

I've noticed a similar issue just now with Windows too.

The RID has changed from win10-x64 to win-x64.

This is then causing dotnet publish --self-contained --runtime win10-x64 to fail with this error (logs):

Error: /usr/share/dotnet/sdk/8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11/Sdks/Microsoft.NET.Sdk/targets/Microsoft.NET.Sdk.FrameworkReferenceResolution.targets(90,5): error NETSDK1083: The specified RuntimeIdentifier 'win10-x64' is not recognized.

8.0.100-rc.1.23412.1

❯ dotnet --info
.NET SDK:
 Version:   8.0.100-rc.1.23412.1
 Commit:    e9e2e45de3

Runtime Environment:
 OS Name:     Windows
 OS Version:  10.0.22621
 OS Platform: Windows
 RID:         win10-x64
 Base Path:   C:\Coding\martincostello\website\.dotnetcli\sdk\8.0.100-rc.1.23412.1\

8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11

❯ dotnet --info
.NET SDK:
 Version:   8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11
 Commit:    1c0b692a4e

Runtime Environment:
 OS Name:     Windows
 OS Version:  10.0.22621
 OS Platform: Windows
 RID:         win-x64
 Base Path:   C:\Coding\martincostello\api\.dotnet\sdk\8.0.100-rc.1.23414.11\

[marcpopMSFT]

@dsplaisted @elinor-fung is this fallout of the simplified ridgraph changes? @v-xiaofchen @martincostello Does seting UseRidGraph to true fix this?

See this for more details:
#34279

[martincostello]

I wasn't sure if this was an intentional change or not (I did do a quick Google search for something but I didn't find anything). I realise that ingesting daily builds means that I'm probably getting intentional things before they're officially communicated to users.

If this is intended and the end-result behaviour is the same, then I can update my testing branch to publish for win-x64 instead.

[kasperk81]

not a fallout

• by design Simplify RID Model designs#260
• breaking change [Breaking change]: Projects targeting .NET 8 and higher will by default use a smaller, portable RID graph. docs#36527

use simple rids or set UseRidGraph=true for old behavior

[dsplaisted]

Yes, this is an expected result of the RID graph changes.