Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IDEA] Partial match support for smart responses #332

Open
Ign88 opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[IDEA] Partial match support for smart responses #332

Ign88 opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Ign88
Copy link

Ign88 commented Aug 21, 2023

Desktop
Add the ability to send simple responses when DATA partially matches. Thank you.

@dannagle dannagle changed the title [IDEA] [IDEA] Partial match support for smart responses Aug 24, 2023
@kalatchev
Copy link

First of all - thanks for the product!

It will be nice to have "Equals To", "Contains", "Starts With" and "Ends With" operands for matching incoming packets. Even better will be to have "Regex Match". If you decide to implement regex, then it will be good to have captures as a placeholders in response.

@martijnvanvloten
Copy link

First of all - thanks for the product!

It will be nice to have "Equals To", "Contains", "Starts With" and "Ends With" operands for matching incoming packets. Even better will be to have "Regex Match". If you decide to implement regex, then it will be good to have captures as a placeholders in response.

This would be a great and helpfull feature.

@briann5545
Copy link

Please implement this feature. PacketSender isn't that useful to me because it DOESN'T have this feature. I was looking for a tool that would send a few different responses based on if certain packets received, but the packets I send are created dynamically so it's almost impossible to create an exact match to accommodate Packetsender. Having "starts with" or "contains" as a filter would make this software a lot more useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants