We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Follow-up from #49, which will close #39 but uses my quick-and-dirty-but-correct MergeSort from https://github.com/dafny-lang/dafny-reportgenerator/blob/main/src/StandardLibrary.dfy#L38. That code is actually very inefficient at runtime because it relies on s[..1] slices which currently impose a full copy.
s[..1]
I'd personally be happy with anything based on arrays instead of sequences, but as per #39 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timsort may be an even better option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See also: https://github.com/dafny-lang/compiler-bootstrap/blob/28299a21101342e5384664c71103c562ad707a80/src/Utils/Lib.Sort.dfy#L357
Sorry, something went wrong.
prvshah51
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Follow-up from #49, which will close #39 but uses my quick-and-dirty-but-correct MergeSort from https://github.com/dafny-lang/dafny-reportgenerator/blob/main/src/StandardLibrary.dfy#L38. That code is actually very inefficient at runtime because it relies on
s[..1]
slices which currently impose a full copy.I'd personally be happy with anything based on arrays instead of sequences, but as per #39 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timsort may be an even better option.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: