You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your work.
The default config of point cloud range in the code is [0, -19.84, -2.5, 47.36, 19.84, 0.5] (code here). It is different from the point cloud range that was mentioned in the paper ([(0, 70.4),(−40, 40),(−3, 1)] meters).
What was the config that you used for the paper?
From my point of view, it's not fair to compare your results to other methods if the models are trained with different settings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your work.
The default config of point cloud range in the code is [0, -19.84, -2.5, 47.36, 19.84, 0.5] (code here). It is different from the point cloud range that was mentioned in the paper ([(0, 70.4),(−40, 40),(−3, 1)] meters).
What was the config that you used for the paper?
From my point of view, it's not fair to compare your results to other methods if the models are trained with different settings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: