-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unable to run refresh on LinuxVirtualMachineScaleSet #512
Comments
Same issue is happening with WindowsVirtualMachineScaleSet |
I migrated from 0.34 to 0.36 without provider family and started to have a lot of issues like the one describe in this issue, for resources where the CRD changed. After install >0.34, the provider put a new controller running, but didn't updated/took ownership of the existing CRDs 0.35 - https://github.com/upbound/provider-azure/blob/e0bb020ca71ebc9b7ad0f2c35de9fed29c796fa0/package/crds/compute.azure.upbound.io_windowsvirtualmachinescalesets.yaml#L141C19-L141C42 - "enable" field inside "automaticInstanceRepair" on 0.35 is not required. 0.34 - https://github.com/upbound/provider-azure/blob/8838beed1432b26d7dffd236007b426942ee926d/package/crds/compute.azure.upbound.io_windowsvirtualmachinescalesets.yaml#L143 - "enable" field inside "automaticInstanceRepair" on 0.34 is required. After this i tested with provider families and i was not able to replicate the issue, i created resources with 0.34 and after change provider to 0.36 the CRD was updated by new providerrevision... |
Thanks, I'll check that out. |
that seems to have fixed the issue for me, thank you |
What happened?
After building a LinuxVirtualMachineScaleSet resource, I get the error condition:
How can we reproduce it?
Building the example in https://marketplace.upbound.io/providers/upbound/provider-azure-compute/v0.35.0/resources/compute.azure.upbound.io/LinuxVirtualMachineScaleSet/v1beta1#doc:spec-forProvider-networkInterface-ipConfiguration-publicIpAddress-publicIpPrefixId will reproduce the error
What environment did it happen in?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: