-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IEKF != IESKF? #61
Comments
I have the same doubts about this question, may I ask whether the problem you raised has been solved? |
@ysingfun |
@ysingfun Notes on Kalman Filter (KF, EKF, ESKF, IEKF, IESKF) |
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello Gavin Gao,
I just watched your wonderful blog post about IEKF derivation from the Linear Gaussian Model. Then I'm about to start using your imu_x_fusion repo.
post: https://cgabc.xyz/posts/784a80cb/#iekf
I just wanted to know if your posting's update X equation is different from the Fast-LIO, ROVIO's IEKF update X equation.
Fast-LIO(arXiv): eq (18)
ROVIO(IJRR 2017) : eq (51)
Is it because your derivation is about only for the IEKF not for IESKF? or just the missing jacobians are hidden by the equations?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: