-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
question about the measurementH of VO #5
Comments
@SkyPigZhu the formula of the measurement Jacobian in code |
ok, thanks , and I find that if the measurement is not very accurate(such as the position has a average error of 15 mm , angle error is 5-6degree), the eskf system's perfoemance is not very good , the corrected vel is not accurate , and the corrected positoion will be volatility, can give some suggestions about the problem? |
Eigen::Quaterniond q1(vo_q.toRotationMatrix() * Tcb.linear()); why the code is q1 = vo_q.toRotationMatrix() * Tcb.linear() ,but thr formula in article is q1= cb.linear()? |
the formula of the measurement Jacobian in code the definition of measurement residual and Jacobian matrix in the code is as below: |
@SkyPigZhu it is a demo project that i wrote to study and practice sensor fusion algrithms, and it is not accuracy and robust in some cases. you can optimize it and fork and pull request. |
@cggos Thanks for your codes. Besides what is the meaning of the subscript bn in the measurement function h(x)? |
presentation of the algorithm: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353330937_IMU_and_VO_Loose_Fusion_based_on_ESKF |
@cggos Are you sure it is bn instead of bm? |
@zzhh00 you can reference the sketch below which the code based on or the presentation/publication in ResearchGate |
@cggos Thanks for your reply. However why the measurement is not Tc0cm? As your formula, the measurement is Tc0cm*Tcmcn=Tc0cn. It is obvious that cm refers to the measurement frame from camera. We get the Tcmcn through imu, why we use the value of imu in the measurement function? |
|
@cggos Thank you. |
I see code "Eigen::Quaterniond q1(vo_q.toRotationMatrix() * Tcb.linear());"
Is not the same as the formula in your article
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: