-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] Bun support #452
Comments
I do not have too much knowledge about bun. I've got some questions we could start with:
|
I only know the answer to the first question - Expo for example is fully supporting Bun with all its tools now, and I get the feeling they're almost recommending it because of it's speed and reduced need for tooling. Similarly to jest you can specify a test setup file, either with a Hopefully it's just a matter of being able to specify bun as the test runner instead of jest :) Note that it supports TypeScript and ESM seamlessly, so that takes away a lot of complexity. |
This issue could/should be implemented in 2 phases:
|
@mdjastrzebski However, at least two problems are stopping me from running Reassure in the Bun runtime: It's fairly easy to make the changes needed to run Reassure in the Bun test environment, but performance may vary (runtime optimizations). |
I'm trying to get a test suite running with Bun, but it seems to use node and jest no matter what I do. Feels like the wiring is under the hood and not configurable. It would be great to be able to run Reassure with Bun :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: