Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sijms/go-ora/v2 fails to build #881

Closed
lemonlove7 opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

sijms/go-ora/v2 fails to build #881

lemonlove7 opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working reflection

Comments

@lemonlove7
Copy link

report errors
code

github.com/sijms/go-ora/v2

B4EDJjS3uEw.go:4: cannot use struct{jWXIQhZw int; lft2006 int; oGTZiUH_ int; uC9PhgkJZZp int; hwWt0aJT int; jKJcJf int}{…} (value of type struct{jWXIQhZw int; lft2006 int; oGTZiUH_ int; uC9PhgkJZZp int; hwWt0aJT int; jKJcJf int}) as struct{varchar int; nvarchar int; raw int; number int; date int; timestamp int} value in struct literal
exit status 2
exit status 1
image

@lu4p lu4p added reflection bug Something isn't working labels Oct 28, 2024
@mvdan mvdan changed the title report errors sijms/go-ora/v2 fails to build Nov 23, 2024
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 26, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Instead of excluding specific names from obfuscation "all" names are now  obfuscated.

For reflected names, a mapping to the original name is injected in internal/abi to resolve them correctly.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Go code can retrieve and use field and method names via the `reflect` package.
For that reason, historically we did not obfuscate names of fields and methods
underneath types that we detected as used for reflection, via e.g. `reflect.TypeOf`.

However, that caused a number of issues. Since we obfuscate and build one package
at a time, we could only detect when types were used for reflection in their own package
or in upstream packages. Use of reflection in downstream packages would be detected
too late, causing one package to obfuscate the names and the other not to, leading to a build failure.

A different approach is implemented here. All names are obfuscated now, but we collect
those types used for reflection, and at the end of a build in `package main`,
we inject a function into the runtime's `internal/abi` package to reverse the obfuscation
for those names which can be used for reflection.

This does mean that the obfuscation for these names is very weak, as the binary
contains a one-to-one mapping to their original names, but they cannot be obfuscated
without breaking too many Go packages out in the wild. There is also some amount
of overhead in `internal/abi` due to this, but we aim to make the overhead insignificant.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
lu4p added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
Go code can retrieve and use field and method names via the `reflect` package.
For that reason, historically we did not obfuscate names of fields and methods
underneath types that we detected as used for reflection, via e.g. `reflect.TypeOf`.

However, that caused a number of issues. Since we obfuscate and build one package
at a time, we could only detect when types were used for reflection in their own package
or in upstream packages. Use of reflection in downstream packages would be detected
too late, causing one package to obfuscate the names and the other not to, leading to a build failure.

A different approach is implemented here. All names are obfuscated now, but we collect
those types used for reflection, and at the end of a build in `package main`,
we inject a function into the runtime's `internal/abi` package to reverse the obfuscation
for those names which can be used for reflection.

This does mean that the obfuscation for these names is very weak, as the binary
contains a one-to-one mapping to their original names, but they cannot be obfuscated
without breaking too many Go packages out in the wild. There is also some amount
of overhead in `internal/abi` due to this, but we aim to make the overhead insignificant.

Fixes #884, #799, #817, #881, #858, #843, #842

Closes #406
@lu4p lu4p closed this as completed Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working reflection
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants