Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: carapace autocomplete definitions for Dorothy commands #255

Open
balupton opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
enhancement Improvement or suggestion PR / Bounty only External demand, as such, external funding / effort is required to make this happen

Comments

@balupton
Copy link
Member

balupton commented Oct 14, 2024

This is a suggestion from @molleweide

We could build a parser for the help documentation, or the options parsing, or even better, use a LLM trained on Dorothy's source files, to generate the carapace definitions.

As for which AI to use, it would need to be something that can be trained/loaded with Dorothy's source files, in which a GitHub Copilot alternative seems suitable, in which a quick search reveals these (there could be more):

@balupton balupton added bug Broken or unexpected enhancement Improvement or suggestion PR / Bounty only External demand, as such, external funding / effort is required to make this happen and removed bug Broken or unexpected labels Oct 14, 2024
@molleweide
Copy link
Collaborator

Since dorothy commands follow posix more or less it shouldnt be hard to put together something basic that just adds options and actions to the yaml configs.

The first iteration doesnt even have to be perfect, just a dwmo to see how it would be..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement or suggestion PR / Bounty only External demand, as such, external funding / effort is required to make this happen
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants