Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filtering by N/A BORO ID doesn't work [4] #2498

Open
BCerki opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Filtering by N/A BORO ID doesn't work [4] #2498

BCerki opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@BCerki
Copy link
Contributor

BCerki commented Nov 20, 2024

Describe the Bug:

If you type n/a into the grid search box, you don't get the N/A records. This is because the filtering searches the boro id in the db, and we don't have "N/A" in the db. "N/A" is added on the front end.

We have the same situation in the transfer grid and using filtering_including_not_applicable in the service should fix it.

Probability: 3

(How likely the bug is to happen, scored from 1-5. For example, probability of 5 is something like "it happens to all users every time they log in." whereas probability of 1 "only happens to certain users when a really specific and unlikely path is followed.")

Impact: 1

(How bad the bug is when it does happen, scored from 1-5. For example, effect of 5 is "the entire app crashes and makes it unusable for all users" or "the bug causes the wrong data to be saved, with critical information (e.g. payment) being affected." whereas effect of 1 is "It makes some styling look a little bit weird.")

Bug Matrix

Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

  1. Step Lets use common phrasing #1
  2. Step Add missing topics #2
  3. Step Add project lifecycle badge #3

Screenshots:

Additional information:

OS: [e.g. iOS]
Browser: [e.g. chrome, safari]
Version: [e.g. 22]

Additional Context

@BCerki BCerki added the Bug label Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant