You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In bazelbuild/rules_pkg#716 (comment) there's a suggestion that rules need complexity in their release process in order to make them secure.
I believe we have already followed excellent security practices in the way releases are created here. By only allowing a developer with write access to push a tag, there's no way to create a release with contents that aren't reproducible from the sources.
I'd be very interested to know of any vulnerabilities with our approach, as there are now dozens of rulesets based on this template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note, I met a Googler at PackagingCon who works in OSS security and got the sense that our approach here is totally fine. I wish I had remembered this issue at the time and gotten that person's sign-off.
In bazelbuild/rules_pkg#716 (comment) there's a suggestion that rules need complexity in their release process in order to make them secure.
I believe we have already followed excellent security practices in the way releases are created here. By only allowing a developer with write access to push a tag, there's no way to create a release with contents that aren't reproducible from the sources.
I'd be very interested to know of any vulnerabilities with our approach, as there are now dozens of rulesets based on this template.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: