[WIP] document multi-user usage of same budget file #496
Conversation
actual-github-bot
bot
changed the title
✅ Deploy Preview for actualbudget-website ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
docs/experimental/multi-user.md
Outdated
| # Multi-user | ||
|
|
||
| :::warning | ||
| This is an **experimental feature**. That means we’re still working on finishing it. There may be bugs, missing functionality or incomplete documentation, and we may decide to remove the feature in a future release. If you have any feedback, please [open an issue](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues) or post a message in the Discord. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| This is an **experimental feature**. That means we’re still working on finishing it. There may be bugs, missing functionality or incomplete documentation, and we may decide to remove the feature in a future release. If you have any feedback, please [open an issue](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues) or post a message in the Discord. | |
| This is an **experimental feature**, which means we’re still working on finishing it. There may be bugs, missing functionality, or incomplete documentation, and we may decide to remove the feature in a future release. If you have any feedback, please [open an issue](https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/issues) or post a message in Discord. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just copied this section from one of the other experimental pages, so maybe fix them all in one (separate) PR? Also see below... sounds like we might want to move this out of "Experimental" altogether since it isn't like the other actually checkbox-toggled experimental features.
|
The experimental section in the docs is only used for experimental features (shown in the settings page of Actual)
Multi user (in this capacity) is not a feature in itself, but the ability can be documented on another page if you'd like to copy what you've done to another relevant page. |
|
@matt-fidd good call, will do. |
|
Do you prefer commits squashed or as-is? |
As-is is fine, we squash merge anyway |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great, thank you! Will let @RubenOlsen have the final say before it goes in
Discussed in:
Could someone with intimate knowledge of the syncing architecture/CRDTs/etc. validate and help me perfect the text? I took the conservative approach with my "To be safe..." comment, but if it truly is fine to edit simultaneously, we should say so less conservatively. Moreso, if simultaneous edits are supported behavior, we should also take this page out of "experimental".