Evidence for celestial vectors

[LifeIsStrange]

The term celestial vector might seems a bit fringe but it simply denote a signal we observe that can be geolocated to specific coordinates in the universe. In that sense, the famous CMB cold spot can roughly be seen as a cosmological vector/coordinate or any other point source like anomalous phenomena.

Historically the term has in large parts been used in aether theories.
Basically, when we observe a physical anomalie, e.g. in lab via a light interferometer, sometimes the data allows to correlate the anomaly with a specific location in the sky. The dream, that has never been realized until now, would be to corroborate distinct physical anomalies/experiments by showing their all point to the same anomalous location in the sky!

Those studies typically are very little known hence it might be that such scientifically groundbreaking corroboration of their coordinates might already be found.
One of the few papers I read that mentioned a celestial vector is a state of the art reexperiment of the most famous experiment in physics, the michelson morlay experiment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment
There has always been a residual anomalous signal in the experiment, and the recent reproduction has allowed for the first time to measure it with better sensitivity and confirm it is a true new physics signal and not noise.
The paper can be read here https://rdcu.be/dQYyA (somehow only work on firefox on my pc)

The ellipse in Fig. 19, right panel, shows the mean ± 2 × SEM, lying notably close to the predicted dark matter vector, RA
21.20 h, DEC + 48.19° [8, 10], near the constellation Cygnus and well away from the CMB vector.

So the paper finds a coordinate for the signal. He finds that the signal has a lot of intra day variance (noise and orbit effects, maybe allais related) but through enough measurements he finds a mean coordinate that is far from the CMB vector, but close to "the predicted dark matter vector". This is intriguing though I am not familiar with this dark matter vector prediction.

Anyway, the coordinates are:
RA 21.20 h, DEC + 48.19° (confidence interval unstated)
If I understand correctly, hours are converted to degree by multiplying by 15, if so then we get the following space coordinate:
RA 318°, DEC + 48.19°

Then I read the fascinating research of a rogue scientist that predicted an alternative to the neutrino and apparently his prediction was later empirically confirmed!
Moreover both the neutrinos/beta decays experiments and various high precision physics (torsion, etc) experiments he performed lead to the identification of anomalous signal with a coherent space coordinate source:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0808.2804

the following coordinates in the second equatorial coordinate system: right ascension
α = 293o ± 10 o , declination δ = 36o ± 10o .

If the same coordinate system is used (what is second equatorial coordinate system?), THEN,
293 +-10 vs 318 and 36+-10 vs 48.19

The numbers are extremely close despite being two completely unrelated experiments and by different authors. They are within their error margin.
If the coordinates were exactly the same and that both RA and DEC vary from 0 to 360 degree (not sure), then I'm a bit rust at maths but how many possible permutations between RA and DEC ?
360+(360×359×2) = 257400.
Not sure the calculation is exactly right but roughly should be correct.
So if the coordinates were exact, there would be 1 out of 257400 chance for this finding to be a coincidence.
Not the coordinate cannot be proven to be exact given measurements uncertainties, but they are so close indeed one understand it is extremely highly improbable for it to be a coincidence.
If I understand correctly the math, allowing values within said permutations to be within 10-12 of difference (which is their uncertainty level) means the fact they are so close is at least 1/25740.

I therefore uncover one of the most little known and wildest corroboration of new physics!
Next would be to ask Porcelli to reproduce the experiments!

related https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.00092
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360267074_Neutrino-Flux_Variability_Nuclear-Decay_Variability_and_Their_Apparent_Relationship