Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

State of affairs inquiry #11

Open
sheinbergon opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

State of affairs inquiry #11

sheinbergon opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@sheinbergon
Copy link

Hi.

First of all, thank you for all of your hard work and effort in putting this library together.
A few things:

  1. Is this project alive and actively maintained? are there any additional releases planned?
  2. Aritfact publishing is a bit messy at the moment, Gradle build does not properly set up version/group in accordance to what's published (up to a point local artifact publishing isn't supported OOTB). And of course, no-snapshots available :-(
  3. Some code design decisions make it hard to share/reuse code in the state-machine declarations. I can give a concrete example, but I'd be more than happy to try and fix it myself.
  4. Would you be willing to accep pull requests?

@zhxnlai 10x in advance

@sheinbergon sheinbergon changed the title State of affairs inquiry. State of affairs inquiry Mar 21, 2019
@zhxnlai
Copy link
Collaborator

zhxnlai commented Apr 2, 2019

@sheinbergon Thanks for the feedback and sorry for not getting back to you earlier! FYI,

  1. I am restructuring the project to smaller files to improve readability. Besides that, because the state machine itself is stable, no release is planned right now unless there are bugs.
  2. I agree and I want to fix the publishing process. However, we are currently constrained to use Jitpack to deliver public artifacts because Bintray publishing is pending review internally. I will spend time to investigate how Jitpack Snapshot works
  3. Could you send me an example? I would love to learn about your use case. By the way, there is a with method that could be used as a builder.
  4. Of course. PRs are welcome!

@holgerbrandl
Copy link

Any news in this regard?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants