You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
docker-socket-proxy is licensed under Apache 2.0. This is fine - you can release the configuration file under any license you choose. However, HAProxy is GPL2. When docker-socket-proxy is built into a container image, does the reliance on HAProxy cause the whole to become GPL2? I ask because the docker-socket-proxy container image is shown as Apache 2.0 on ghcr.io.
Apologies for troubling you with this - I'm sure any confusion is on my part. I just wanted to double check to ensure that docker-socket-proxy had a license that was compatible with my needs.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
docker-socket-proxy is licensed under Apache 2.0. This is fine - you can release the configuration file under any license you choose. However, HAProxy is GPL2. When docker-socket-proxy is built into a container image, does the reliance on HAProxy cause the whole to become GPL2? I ask because the docker-socket-proxy container image is shown as Apache 2.0 on ghcr.io.
Apologies for troubling you with this - I'm sure any confusion is on my part. I just wanted to double check to ensure that docker-socket-proxy had a license that was compatible with my needs.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions