-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multiple Inputs per Node #143
Comments
Thanks a lot for the issue @sebastianpfluegelmeier! This should currently be supported, however it's a bit of a pain to use atm as it simply means the It would probably be nicer if the |
Thank you for your quick response @mitchmindtree. Allright, suppose i have two Nodes A and B which send their output two distinct inputs of the Node C. |
Maybe the type of |
Ahh sorry, to clarify - by |
So you would recomend a node knows where each input is coming from? I would rather have multiple inputs per node and have a method
So we would not break backwards compatability and can have multiple inputs which can be connected with a function
what do you think about that? |
Hi guys. I'm really interested in this library here in 2019 and particularly I need this feature. This would allow to modulate a node parameter (input) by the output of another node, right? If so, I should add, that it should be possible to make multiple outputs too. Using analogy with modular synth, you have many inputs and outputs, which you can modulate or use to modulate inputs of other modules. As I said, I'm extremely interested in this feature and you can count on me as labour force. I could implement it, just give me a direction. |
It would be nice to have multiple inputs per node so that things like filters with parameters controlled by more inputs can be done. I will also implement this if it is wanted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: