Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (103 loc) · 4.27 KB

post-workshop-survey.md

File metadata and controls

164 lines (103 loc) · 4.27 KB
Raw

Reproducible Science Workshop, June 1-2, 2015

The organizers of the Reproducible Science Workshop are very interested in your feedback! Your input is extremely valuable as we develop future workshops. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete. Please respond by June 9th.

By completing this survey, you are are giving consent for iDigBio personnel to use your responses. Your participation is voluntary. There are no direct benefits or risks to you for participating, and no compensation. You may quit at any time or skip any item. If you respond via email, your IP address will be registered; however, your responses will remain anonymous. Thank you for your help.

If you have questions about this survey, contact Dr. Shari Ellis, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 352-273-2066, [email protected].

If you do not wish to participate, please close your browser at this time.

Which of the following did you or do prior to participating in the workshop?

  • Robust file organization
  • Version control (e.g., Git/GitHub)
  • Litterate programming (e.g., knitr/Rmarkdown)
  • Sharing and publishing my analysis using licences facilitating re-use

Why did you attend?

We are interested in learning more about why you decided to participate in the workshop. How much did you interest in learning about each of the following topic contribute to your decision to participate

[provide scale: "none", "little", "some", "a lot" for the following questions]

File management and organization

Literate programing (e.g., knitr/Rmarkdown)

Version control (e.g., Git/GitHub)

Publishing practices that facilitate re-use

Please rate the success of the following workshop sessions

Introduction to Reproducible Science

  • Very unsuccessful
  • Unsuccessful
  • Neither unsuccessful nor successful
  • Successful
  • Very successful

File organization for Reproducible Science

  • Very unsuccessful
  • Unsuccessful
  • Neither unsuccessful nor successful
  • Successful
  • Very successful

Introduction to version control

  • Very unsuccessful
  • Unsuccessful
  • Neither unsuccessful nor successful
  • Successful
  • Very successful

Automating your workflows

  • Very unsuccessful
  • Unsuccessful
  • Neither unsuccessful nor successful
  • Successful
  • Very successful

Sharing and Publishing your research workflow

  • Very unsuccessful
  • Unsuccessful
  • Neither unsuccessful nor successful
  • Successful
  • Very successful

List up to 2 topics that could have benefited from more thorough coverage

[open text]

List up to 2 topics that should have been de-emphasized in favor of topics you listed above

[open text]

What was the most useful thing you learned during the workshop?

[open text]

How likely are you to do the activities listed below now compared to before workshop

[provide scale: "less likely", "about the same", "more likely", "much more likely", for the following questions.]

Better organize my files

Adopt literate programming

Use version control in my research

Publish my work using approaches that facilitate re-use

Please rate your ability to conduct reproducible research now, compared to prior to the workshop

  • Lower
  • About the same
  • Higher
  • Much higher

How well did the workshop meet your expectation?

[open text]

Please rate your level of agreement with the following statements

[provide scale: "Strong disagree", "Disagree", "Neither agree nor disagree", "Agree", "Strongly agree"]

  • The workshop provided me the skills to better organize my files
  • The workshop provided me the skills to adopt literate programming in my research
  • The workshop provided me the skills to publish my work using approaches that facilitate re-use
  • The workshop was worth my time
  • I would recommend this workshop to a friend

What overall grade would you give the workshop?

[sliding scale: A+,A,A-,...,F]

I attended the workshop:

  • in person?
  • remotely?

I attended:

  • all the sessions/both days
  • some/all of the first day
  • some/all of the second day

My primary role at the workshop was as:

  • presenter
  • participant
  • presenter/participant (both)

If you have any other comments to share, please do so in the space below.

[open text]