Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lack of concat_map / concat_all #723

Open
sshumaker opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Lack of concat_map / concat_all #723

sshumaker opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sshumaker
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We're missing a basic capability - concat_map / concat_all. We're also missing alternatives that would allow it to be easily implemented.

Describe the solution you'd like
Implement concat_map and concat_all. The key is to behave like flat_map with a max concurrency of 1, so items are fully flattened but in sequential order.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Maybe I'm missing something, but even flat_map isn't documented. How are you supposed to handle higher order observables?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant