-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show disused and abandoned and razed tracks in different colours for accessibility #116
Comments
Disused and abandoned tracks have a similar colour but you can also distinguish them by the dashing. Abandoned tracks are dashed (5,5), disused tracks are not dashed. However, dashing does not look as expected on lower zoom levels because individual OSM ways are rendered as individual linestrings and therefore, dashing restarts at each node where the ways are split up (see #1). |
I know that abandoned tracks are dashed. However, that is really hard to see. Maybe we could let users decide the colour or use a different colour. Ideally users could choose what tracks do display, so even people that do not have colour perception can use the map by only enabling what they are interested in. |
I have an idea, which i still need to test though. How about using a thin non dotted line with the razed tracked color at low zoom and at high zoom values make the line for razed dotted? I think at high zoom it isn't fascinating anyway if a track is just demolished or built over? |
Nah, I'm asking specifically because I want to find those tracks, so I have to be able to see them at low zoom levels. :D |
Hello,
please change the colours for tracks that are disused to something else that is not the same as abandoned or razed.
It's pretty hard to spot the difference. This is also an accessibility issue. Ideally users could choose what to display without relying on slight colour differences at all.
I'm trying to learn more about disused tracks im my area and it often happens that I think I found one, zoom in and then it is actually abandoned or razed. Also, the difference between abandoned and razed is even harder to see.
I'd also like some clarification as to what the differences between disused and abandoned are. To me it sounds like the same. Razed seems like "non-existent". Is that a correct interpretation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: