Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Epic] UX Improvements for Admins #653

Open
13 tasks
ismisepaul opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
13 tasks

[Epic] UX Improvements for Admins #653

ismisepaul opened this issue May 25, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@ismisepaul ismisepaul changed the title UX Improvements UX Improvements for Admins May 25, 2022
@jmarquez90
Copy link

Hi - I'm looking into these issues right now. Would it be easier to coordinate if these were broken into separate tickets?

@markdenihan
Copy link
Member

That makes sense!

@jmarquez90
Copy link

@markdenihan So I've gone and created separate tickets for each item and I've tagged @ismisepaul in each one so he can get updates. I imagine we can probably close this ticket then and focus on each one separately? Let me know if you want me to make any changes. I typically try and do open-source work Thursday/Friday mornings (from Chicago).

@ismisepaul
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @jmarquez90 thanks for taking these on, it's awesome!

One tip if you're looking to create anymore, you can simply click beside the issue to convert the checkbox to an issue e.g.
image

@ismisepaul
Copy link
Member Author

ismisepaul commented Jul 21, 2022

Ignore above, your way works too. Let's close this one and just roll with the separate tickets. (the initial idea was this would be the epic ticket and there would be subtasks that could be tracked)

I've taken a look there and no changes on my part, thanks again! 👍

@ismisepaul ismisepaul changed the title UX Improvements for Admins [Epic] UX Improvements for Admins Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants