Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should the Ontology Include an eforms SDK version concept #708

Open
AchillesDougalis opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 Discussed in #656 · 2 comments
Open

Should the Ontology Include an eforms SDK version concept #708

AchillesDougalis opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 Discussed in #656 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
act: for WG discussion it needs to be discussed within the Working Group aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: question something needs clarified, refined or decided
Milestone

Comments

@AchillesDougalis
Copy link
Contributor

AchillesDougalis commented Oct 17, 2024

Decission WG 31/10/2024

The predicate epo:implementsSpecification was created in order to address specifications such as eForms SDK version.

Image

Image

Discussed in #656

@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: question something needs clarified, refined or decided act: for WG discussion it needs to be discussed within the Working Group aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO labels Oct 17, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Oct 17, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis changed the title Should eforms SDK version be added in the Ontology? Should the Ontology Include an eforms SDK version concept Oct 17, 2024
@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

We need further discuss whether we need a CustomizationID in ePO:
<cbc:UBLVersionID>2.3</cbc:UBLVersionID> <cbc:CustomizationID>eforms-sdk-1.7</cbc:CustomizationID>

@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

During WGM 28/11/2024 it was implemented as depicted below:
Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
act: for WG discussion it needs to be discussed within the Working Group aux: alignment alignment between ESPD, eForms and ePO aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: question something needs clarified, refined or decided
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants