Show sample for each Level type on ROBOT report #134
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Makefile (1)
Line range hint
1-27: Overall impact on Makefile is minimal and aligned with objectives.The removal of the
truncate_reports_for_githubtarget is the only change in this Makefile. This modification doesn't affect the execution of other targets or introduce any new dependencies. The overall structure for building and managing the dashboard remains intact.Consider updating any documentation that might reference the removed
truncate_reports_for_githubtarget to reflect this change. This will help maintain consistency between the code and its documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- util/create_report_html.py (1 hunks)
- util/dashboard_config.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
util/dashboard_config.py (1)
78-79: Verify the impact of disabling GitHub post-processingThe lines for post-processing files for GitHub have been commented out. This change may affect how the dashboard files are handled after their generation.
To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the workflow, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential issues arising from the removal of this functionality. Please review the results to ensure that no critical GitHub-related processing is being overlooked.
Consider the following points:
- If this change is intentional, update any documentation that might reference the GitHub post-processing step.
- Ensure that any downstream processes or scripts that may have depended on this post-processing step are updated accordingly.
- If this is a temporary change for debugging or testing purposes, consider using a feature flag instead of commenting out the code to make it easier to re-enable in the future.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Disabling GitHub post-processing has no adverse effects
The commented-out lines for post-processing files for GitHub in
util/dashboard_config.pydo not impact the current functionality:
- The
truncate_reports_for_githubmake target does not exist in theMakefile, indicating that this functionality is not in use.- Other GitHub-related references found are confined to comments and documentation, posing no risk to the workflow.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to the truncate_reports_for_github make target # Test 1: Search for references to the make target in Python files echo "Searching for references to truncate_reports_for_github in Python files:" rg --type python "truncate_reports_for_github" # Test 2: Check if the make target still exists in the Makefile echo "Checking if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile:" rg --type make "^truncate_reports_for_github:" # Test 3: Look for any GitHub-related processing in other parts of the codebase echo "Searching for other GitHub-related processing:" rg --type python "github"Length of output: 600
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify references to truncate_reports_for_github and GitHub-related processing # Test 1: Search for references to the make target in Python files echo "Searching for references to truncate_reports_for_github in Python files:" rg "truncate_reports_for_github" -- '*.py' # Test 2: Check if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile echo "Checking if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile:" rg "^truncate_reports_for_github:" Makefile # Test 3: Look for any GitHub-related processing in other parts of the codebase echo "Searching for other GitHub-related processing in Python files:" rg "github" -- '*.py'Length of output: 649
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify references to truncate_reports_for_github and GitHub-related processing # Test 1: Search for references to the make target in Python files echo "Searching for references to truncate_reports_for_github in Python files:" rg "truncate_reports_for_github" --glob "*.py" # Test 2: Check if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile echo "Checking if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile:" rg "^truncate_reports_for_github:" Makefile # Test 3: Look for any GitHub-related processing in Python files echo "Searching for other GitHub-related processing in Python files:" rg "github" --glob "*.py"Length of output: 8422
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify references to truncate_reports_for_github and GitHub-related processing # Test 1: Search for references to the make target in Python files echo "Searching for references to truncate_reports_for_github in Python files:" rg "truncate_reports_for_github" --glob "*.py" # Test 2: Check if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile echo "Checking if the truncate_reports_for_github target exists in the Makefile:" rg "^truncate_reports_for_github:" Makefile # Test 3: Look for any GitHub-related processing in Python files echo "Searching for other GitHub-related processing in Python files:" rg "github" --glob "*.py"Length of output: 8422
| # truncate_reports_for_github: | ||
| # $(eval REPORTS := $(wildcard dashboard/*/robot_report.tsv)) | ||
| # for REP in $(REPORTS); do \ | ||
| # touch $$REP; \ | ||
| # cat $$REP | head -$(REPORT_LENGTH_LIMIT) > $$REP.tmp; \ | ||
| # mv $$REP.tmp $$REP; \ | ||
| # done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Detected: robot_report.tsv is empty.
The robot_report.tsv file located at the repository root has a size of 0 bytes, indicating that no robot reports are being generated. This affects the objective of displaying ERROR samples as intended by the PR.
- Verify the process that generates
robot_report.tsvto ensure it is functioning correctly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Removal of report truncation aligns with PR objectives.
Commenting out the truncate_reports_for_github target is in line with the PR objective to show more samples in the ROBOT report. This change will allow the full robot reports to be preserved, potentially showing all ERROR samples as requested in the linked issue #133.
Consider monitoring the impact on file sizes of the robot reports. If they become too large, you might need to implement a more selective sampling method. To verify the current file sizes, you can run:
This will help ensure that the removal of truncation doesn't lead to excessively large files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the size of robot report files
find dashboard -name "robot_report.tsv" -exec du -h {} +
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all robot_report.tsv files in the repository
find . -type f -name "robot_report.tsv"
Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the size of the robot_report.tsv file
du -h ./robot_report.tsv
Length of output: 47
| report_filtered = report.groupby(by="Level")[ | ||
| ["Level", "Rule Name", "Subject", "Property", "Value"] | ||
| ].apply( | ||
| lambda x: x.sample(calculate_sample_size(x, rest)) | ||
| ).reset_index(drop=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure all required columns are present before selecting
When selecting columns ["Level", "Rule Name", "Subject", "Property", "Value"], ensure that these columns exist in the report DataFrame. If any of these columns are missing, it will raise a KeyError.
Consider adding a check for missing columns:
required_columns = ["Level", "Rule Name", "Subject", "Property", "Value"]
missing_columns = [col for col in required_columns if col not in report.columns]
if missing_columns:
raise KeyError(f"Missing columns in report: {missing_columns}")| except Exception as e: | ||
| print(e) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve exception handling and logging
Catching the broad Exception class is discouraged as it may catch unexpected exceptions and hinder debugging. Additionally, using print(e) is not ideal for error logging. Consider catching specific exceptions and using the logging module for better error reporting.
Proposed fix:
Import the logging module and configure it:
import logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.ERROR)Update the exception handling:
- except Exception as e:
- print(e)
+ except pd.errors.EmptyDataError as e:
+ logging.error(f"Empty data error: {e}")
+ except FileNotFoundError as e:
+ logging.error(f"File not found: {e}")
+ except Exception as e:
+ logging.error(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")| report_filtered = report.head(args.limitlines) | ||
|
|
||
| if len(report_filtered) > args.limitlines: | ||
| report_filtered.to_csv(args.report, sep="\t", index=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cannot write to a file opened in read mode
At line 73, you're attempting to write to args.report, which was opened in read mode ('r'). This will raise an error. You need to open the file in write mode or write to a different output file.
Proposed fix:
Option 1: Open the report file in read-write mode
Modify the argument parser:
- parser.add_argument('report',
- type=argparse.FileType('r'),
- help='TSV report to convert to HTML')
+ parser.add_argument('report',
+ type=argparse.FileType('r+'),
+ help='TSV report to convert to HTML')Option 2: Specify a separate output file for the filtered report
Add a new argument for the output report file:
- parser.add_argument('report',
- type=argparse.FileType('r'),
- help='TSV report to convert to HTML')
+ parser.add_argument('report_input',
+ type=argparse.FileType('r'),
+ help='TSV report to convert to HTML')
+ parser.add_argument('report_output',
+ type=argparse.FileType('w'),
+ help='Output filtered report TSV file')Adjust the code accordingly:
- report_filtered.to_csv(args.report, sep="\t", index=False)
+ report_filtered.to_csv(args.report_output, sep="\t", index=False)Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| if error_count_level["ERROR"] < args.limitlines: | ||
| rest = args.limitlines - error_count_level["ERROR"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle KeyError when accessing 'ERROR' in error_count_level
Currently, the code assumes that 'ERROR' is always a key in error_count_level. If there are no entries with the level 'ERROR', this will raise a KeyError. To prevent this, consider using the get method with a default value.
Proposed fix:
- if error_count_level["ERROR"] < args.limitlines:
- rest = args.limitlines - error_count_level["ERROR"]
+ error_count_error = error_count_level.get("ERROR", 0)
+ if error_count_error < args.limitlines:
+ rest = args.limitlines - error_count_error📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if error_count_level["ERROR"] < args.limitlines: | |
| rest = args.limitlines - error_count_level["ERROR"] | |
| error_count_error = error_count_level.get("ERROR", 0) | |
| if error_count_error < args.limitlines: | |
| rest = args.limitlines - error_count_error |
Fixes #133
Preview using CDAO as example
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features
Chores