You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be beneficial to the community if there was a mechanism to inform a user as to what attributes are required to be populated. Sections 0 and 1 are easy because they are static, but 3, 4, and 5 are dynamic according to their template numbers. And even with section 5, some of the metadata, should not be edited by the user.
Saw your comment on the NCEPLIBS-ip CMAKE issue related to this one. This is a work in progress...and thinking out loud here...
Incorrect metadata for sections 3 and 5 would cause the most problems in terms of mapping/plotting and unpacking/packing data values, and with interpolation. Section 4 is product definition info, which could cause problems, but mainly just in terms what the data are.
I'm just using another model dataset, i.e. globally gridded data expressed on 0:360 longitude and the levels, when encoding 3D data is set a integers. I like your notebook that you created and I think an example where encoding a 3D array from scratch, not a copy from 1 grib file to another, is demoed would be a great gesture to the grib2io community :-)
It would be beneficial to the community if there was a mechanism to inform a user as to what attributes are required to be populated. Sections 0 and 1 are easy because they are static, but 3, 4, and 5 are dynamic according to their template numbers. And even with section 5, some of the metadata, should not be edited by the user.
Let me think about an added feature re: this.
Originally posted by @EricEngle-NOAA in #66 (reply in thread)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: