Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Tun mode doesn't work. The load on the processor increases to 40%-100%. #1490

Open
Monoloshka opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Monoloshka
Copy link

Describe the problem

Expected behavior: Accessing the Internet via a virtual adapter.

Actual behavior: Virtual adapter does not provide access to the Internet. The load on the processor increases to 40%-100%. Sing-Box and other gui clients, gives the same result.

No problems with the system proxy are observed.

How to reproduce

Provide helpful screenshots, videos, text descriptions, subscription links, etc.

log

If you have logs, please upload them. Please see the detailed steps for exporting logs in the documentation.

@Monoloshka
Copy link
Author

Monoloshka commented Nov 8, 2024

I tried doing a network reset but it didn't help. The CPU load is gone but now nekobox_core.exe is taking up 10 gigabytes of RAM. Many sites stopped opening through proxies. But some sites, including blocked ones, are open. On Google site I received a message ‘Connection is not secured’ and for some reason in the certificate the name ‘*.internet.org’ is specified by the organisation ‘Meta Platforms, Inc.’ although I go to Google site but the browser did not let me go to Google.
UPD: Ping to any ip is 1 ms, which is very strange. tracert does not work. nslookup always gives ‘DNS request timed out.’, regardless of domain or ip.
Virtual adapters don't work in Hiddify, Karing, and V2rayN either. In VirtualBox the virtual adapter works without problems

@Monoloshka
Copy link
Author

And by the way, why don't you give you the option to choose which company to use the virtual adapter from? If someone's virtual adapter doesn't work, they can switch to another virtual adapter. For example, an alternative to Wireguard virtual adapter could be Windscribe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant