Add a wallet to a hat

[spengrah]

Potentially deploy a proxy contract attached to each hat. This would...

1. give each hat a wallet to receive and send funds
2. potentially allow a hat interact with other smart contract protocols directly rather than requiring that those protocols support erc1155

[spengrah]

This may be unsafe. Consider the following example:

• Account A is an oracle contract
• Account B is also an oracle contract
• Hat 1 has a proxy wallet, called Wallet 1
• Wallet 1 is the oracle for Account B
• Account B is itself the oracle for Hat 2
• Charlize wears Hat 2, and has staked N tokens for the right

If Account A wears Hat 1, then it can -- acting as the oracle for Hat 2 -- sever the tie between Hat 2 and its oracle (Account B). This creates a risk for Charlize's staked tokens: has Charlize lost them when her Hat's no longer has an oracle? It depends on the code governing her staking, so she may be ok, but perhaps not.

To fully protect herself, Charlize would need to understand who controls all the logic that impact her staked tokens. If we don't give hats wallets, Charlize just needs to understand her hat's oracle contract. But if we give hats wallets, the number of contracts Charlize needs to understand (or trust) increases from 1 to multiple. It's 2 in the above example, but there could feasibly be a long string of wallets controlled by hats wearing other hats.

This risk exists primarily for oracles, but it also creates some issues with conditions.

[spengrah]

also related to #7

[spengrah]

As discussed recently, attaching a wallet (i.e. a proxy contract) to an NFT may best be implemented as a protocol of its own, such as...

https://twitter.com/spengrah/status/1533847100068339712