You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
When building specific functionals, we pass a name to the superclass constructor that is just a label.
A few of these superclass init calls have a functional name that doesn't match the class name. AFAICT this name is just an arbitrary label that one attaches, so it doesn't have to match.
To avoid this, we could make it an optional argument, and do:
When building specific functionals, we pass a name to the superclass constructor that is just a label.
A few of these superclass init calls have a functional name that doesn't match the class name. AFAICT this name is just an arbitrary label that one attaches, so it doesn't have to match.
To avoid this, we could make it an optional argument, and do:
Originally posted by @wence- in #56 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: