Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What are the valid values for load_balancing_mode in bigip_ltm_pool? #1006

Open
roncanepa opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
Backlog issue will be tracked by JIRA in backlog enhancement

Comments

@roncanepa
Copy link

Hello,

What are the valid string values for the load_balancing_mode property on a bigip_ltm_pool resource? The documentation [1] doesn't state, and I didn't have any luck uncovering them when searching through the provider source in this repo.

Thank you.

1: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/F5Networks/bigip/latest/docs/resources/bigip_ltm_pool

@pgouband
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

Thanks for reporting. Added to the backlog and internal tracking ID for this request is: INFRAANO-1646.

@pgouband pgouband added the Backlog issue will be tracked by JIRA in backlog label Aug 26, 2024
@RavinderReddyF5
Copy link
Collaborator

RavinderReddyF5 commented Oct 22, 2024

Hi @roncanepa,
here are the possible options for supported load-balancing modes:
will update the documentation for the same:

dynamic-ratio-member
dynamic-ratio-node 
fastest-app-response
fastest-node 
least-connections-members
least-connections-node
least-sessions
observed-member
observed-node
predictive-member
predictive-node
ratio-least-connections-member
ratio-least-connections-node
ratio-member
ratio-node
ratio-session
round-robin
weighted-least-connections-member
weighted-least-connections-node

will have fix for this document in next release, it will look like below.

image

@roncanepa
Copy link
Author

Awesome, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backlog issue will be tracked by JIRA in backlog enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants