You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
In #562 and update was done to improve the writing of the process for the parallel run for the FMcomponent to the dimr_config.
During development of this issue it was discovered that the RRcomponent can also be given a process, as it inherits from abstract component in which process is configured.
When setting the process for the RRcomponent the dimr_config will have the process in the file.
The RRcomponent however cannot run in parallel, thus this setting is incorrect.
How this should behave is to be further decided, @rhutten.
To Reproduce
The file resulting from the code below contains an invalid entry:
Describe the bug
In #562 and update was done to improve the writing of the process for the parallel run for the FMcomponent to the dimr_config.
During development of this issue it was discovered that the RRcomponent can also be given a process, as it inherits from abstract component in which process is configured.
When setting the process for the RRcomponent the dimr_config will have the process in the file.
The RRcomponent however cannot run in parallel, thus this setting is incorrect.
How this should behave is to be further decided, @rhutten.
To Reproduce
The file resulting from the code below contains an invalid entry:
Expected behavior
The process should not be written for the RRcomponent to the dimr_config, to be further decided by @rhutten.
Version info (please complete the following information):
Additional context
Based on what is decided, the solution of #562 might help with the implementation of this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: