-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: add to biocontainers #12
Comments
Yes, we could look into this. Hopefully after the new v0.0.3 release is ready and stable. |
I see PascalX is on v0.0.4. Any chance the dockerfile can be added to biocontainers soon? |
Unfortunately, I do not have currently time to look into this. However, volunteers are welcome ... |
I realize I put 'biocontainers' in the issue subject line, but I meant bioconda (which would then automatically go to biocontainers). @wsjung and I are in the same lab -- we will see if we can find time. @Dan-RAI , would you like to review the bioconda recipe before we put in the pull request (assuming we get to it), or if it runs, are you happy for it to go? |
I am happy if you go for it. Thanks! |
I'm having trouble getting this bioconda recipe to work. I'm getting an error with regards to the c++ compiler. I believe this has to do with this requirement:
But I'm not certain. Here is the bioconda build error:
These are the instructions for testing bioconda recipes locally: https://bioconda.github.io/contributor/building-locally.html#using-bioconda-utils If you do happen to have a chance to look at the recipe, and maybe try to build it, and have any ideas on how to adjust the build.sh, or possibly adjust the makefile itself, I would be interested. |
This line seems to be the problem:
You might have to use absolute paths for the |
Hi all,
It would be nice if the dockerfile were added to biocontainers. Any interest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: